Palm Skips "Me Too" Generation To Deliver Pre

Posted by: Christopher Meinck

Tagged in: webOS , Palm Pre

With the announcement of webOS and the Palm Pre, Palm has been able to turn the smartphone market on it’s collective ear. Promised for a Q2 2009 release, the Palm Pre has become the media darling of so many technology bloggers and deservedly so. Last year at this time, Palm CEO Ed Colligan promised that the "first half fiscal 09  to be a turning point in the business". Thanks to strong sales of the Palm Centro, the company continued to stay the course, despite a barrage of criticism pleading with the company to deliver an update to their line of devices powered by the aging Palm OS. Rather than cave to the pressures of online and print media, Palm continued to develop and design a revolutionary OS that would provide the company with a foundation that will allow for a ever-growing product line of webOS enable devices.

2008 Becomes Year of the Clones

If we look back at 2008, the smartphone market was littered with “me too” clones of Apple’s iPhone, many of whom were self-proclaimed “iPhone killers”. In reality, the lifespan of these product lines will be limited and they lack a solid platform that will enable them to turn into a sustainable product line. Some have been lucky enough to release 2nd generation models, but there was absolutely nothing earth-shattering and certainly nothing that would cause concern amongst senior executives in Cupertino.

No Detail Is Small

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this video 

Revisiting the Fat Middle

Delivering a product that looks, feels, but under-performs the market leader is not a way to capture the hearts and minds of consumers, let alone their pocketbook (or wallets). While many companies were busy following Apple, Palm decided to get revolutionary. Sure there are some characteristics of webOS that appear to be influenced by Apple’s iPhone and that’s natural. In fact, the company hired an Apple designer back in 2007 to help the company compete with the iPhone. To this day, the Phone app on the iPhone looks similar to Palm’s phone app that debuted on the Treo 680. The difference between what Palm has done with webOS is in stark contrast to the clones. Palm was able to take the best in class features available in the marketplace and deliver them in one definable product. While I’m hesitant to call the Pre a runaway success, my slightly less than hands-on experience at CES suggests that Palm’s new Pre phone is in a class by it self. Ed Colligan called it the fat middle. The most popular devices on the market right now would be the BlackBerry Bold and the iPhone 3G. The Palm Pre fits neatly in the middle of those devices. I regularly use both devices, swapping my SIM card with regularity. Both devices are great, but I find that each has voids. Browsing is much better on the iPhone thanks to the WebKit browser, whereas the Bold’s browser can get bogged down especially when encountering pages employing Javascript.

Having used the iPhone since it’s inception, I’m plenty capable when it comes to typing. For some, the keyboard on the iPhone is more than sufficient, but there is a substantial market for those who prefer the tactile response only found with a QWERTY keyboard. Here is where the Pre fits and where I think Palm finds the “fat middle”. The Palm Pre offers all the media-centric features of the iPhone coupled with a browser that is on par with Apple’s Safari. Those who find fault with virtual keyboards won’t have that obstacle with the Pre. Point being that the Pre finds itself with a set of specifications and features that cannot be found using either a BlackBerry Bold or an iPhone 3G. Apple plans to offer a host of improvements with their iPhone OS 3.0 release and many have pitted the new software update versus the Pre. This will not have an affect on the hardware, unless Apple unveils a new iPhone that includes a QWERTY keyboard. That’s not likely given Steve Jobs obsession over the beautification of Apple’s products. I’ll never quite understand how a QWERTY diminishes the look of a product.

To create a successful mobile platform takes time. Consumers are not looking for "me too" products. Products that drive innovation result will usually have a positive effect on sales. Palm could have followed the crowd and we would all be left wanting more. Instead, the company is on the brink of delivering a platform that will drive the companies products and revenues for the next ten years. Will anyone be asking about the so-called smartphones that were released in 2008? They will remember the Palm Pre and a revolutionary OS that turned around Palm.



Comments (6)

bdot1276
...
written by bdot1276, April 13, 2009
Great article Chris! As a Blackberry user and one who appreciates the virtues of the iphone, I agree the the Pre could be that device that fits squarely in the middle of the Bold/Niagara and the iphone. If the price/marketing/device capabilities are right I think there is a lot of room ("Fat Middle")for the Pre to play! Lets just hope that Palm and Sprint deliver on the launch and that the Pre turns out to be the phone that we hope it to be.
0
...
written by Robert1014, April 13, 2009
I was a Sprint customer for 6 years, but last summer, my Spring contract having lapsed and my Spring clamshell phone having become nearly impossible to charge, (the charge plug wouldn't stay in the charging socket on the phone unless I held it in forcibly), and already being an Apple fan and Mac User, I switched to AT&T and purchased an iPhone 3G. I have never experienced any of the several usability issues that some iPhone users have complained about, and, as with all Apple products in my experience, the iPhone is aesthetically beautiful and wonderfully simple to use. It is a revolutionary product, and it's App Store, as with iTunes before it, has created a new business model for the products sold thereby. I'm happy as a clam with the iPhone and expect to stay with it. All that said, I will also say that simply on aesthetic terms, I also lust for the Pre. It's the first iPhone imitator/competitor that I've seen that matches the iPhone aesthetically--I'll admit, good product design is important to me and is not merely trivial or cosmetic--and it looks like it may approach the iPhone's usability as well, although user responses after real world use will tell the tale. I do like the iPhone's touchscreen keyboard and cannot fathom the clamoring for physical keys that so many express. Who knows? Maybe in a few years I'll have to decide whether to stay with iPhone or to switch to the Pre!
Geo
...
written by Geo, April 13, 2009
Business savvy, economic challenge , inovation and risk in a product won't guarantee anything for a product to sell. Only the product can do that. It has to be a product worth looking at, holding, and finally buying. The Pre is just the beginning.
miles4000
...
written by miles4000, April 14, 2009
I don't think the Palm Pre is an iPhone killer, its the anti-iPhone. A great option for all those people who don't want an iPhone! It's has the physical keyboard, replaceable battery, and will hopefully be on other US networks in 2010.
0
...
written by AJ, April 14, 2009
I think that the elements that made a palm the preferred product over others was the organization capability of the device, besides being a good phone. I remember my Treo 650 - pressing the calender button followed by quick inputs with the awesome keyboard, using the SNES emulator to play mario, or just clicking the side button to record a phone call - it was seamless, even if it induced crashes. I just hope the Pre can do even half of that! I say this because the physical keyboard is not available directly - you still have to slide it open - and that involves an additional step - just like winmo devices (additional clicks).

Overall, the Pre does focus on organizing life - and that's Palm's strength - that's where they'll do their business!

I hope I'm wrong and the Pre turns out to be a rocking device!smilies/smiley.gif
tomascco
...
written by tomascco, April 17, 2009
I've got nothing but praise for Apple's products having purchased at Mac 128K in 1984 and now toting a MacBook Pro and an Ipod. So, one would think it would be a natural for me to gravitate toward the Iphone. Not so fast, Ma Bell. AT&T and I have this relationship that would normally call for a restraining order. There is no way in Lucifer's dominion that you would find me on that network. I had a Raccoon contract with them (one in which the trapped attempts to chew off their arm to flee) and bolted at the first opportunity.

Sprint has been great to me, and except for 3G access, my Treo 755p has basically covered the mobile arena for me. Nope, no app store to speak of, but I don't just shop at Wal Mart for all of my needs. I like to shop around. Gives me a greater product selection. I don't mind doing the legwork.

I'm in it for the business functions. I don't need to know where the closest sushi bar is or what blood type my dog has (there's an app for that, I think). I need to know where I need to be and how to contact the people I need to be with.

Yeah, just about any phone can do that, but if the Pre can do it in style and faster, then I'm in.

Write comment

smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy