Palm Pre Gets Reviewed

Posted by: Christopher Meinck

Tagged in: review , Palm Pre

Just a little over 24 hours ago, BGR secured themselves a Palm Pre and promised a full review was forthcoming. Today BGR delivered on their promise offering up a comprehensive review of the Palm Pre.  Here are a few select snippets from BGR's review. Visit their site for the complete review, complete with photos.

The screen is where the Palm Pre shines. Selections take little to no effort and there’s that oh-so-magical water ripple effect when actually touching the display. It’s vibrant, rich and all around really clear.

Keyboard: It’s really not good. You can’t compete with RIM in the keyboard area and you can’t compete with Apple in the soft-keyboard area, so how are people going to enjoy using your product when the data entry isn’t perfection?

It’s fits perfectly in your hand and Palm did a great job blending an awesome touchscreen with a separate multi-touch gesture area, sliding design, and everything else together in this package.

To be honest, the device feels a little cheap. The edges of the bottom piece are sharp on the back of the screen and even worse, when sliding it up and down, the top part that houses the screen will sometimes catch on itself.

ake that for what you will but we don’t see a problem with Palm’s quoted battery life and from other reports, the battery is a pretty decent at keeping you going throughout the day.

The browser for the most part renders pages properly and pretty quickly.

 

 Overall, they seem pleased with the Pre calling the OS great. 



Comments (20)

Rousterfar
...
written by Rousterfar, May 29, 2009
That's hardly a review and I am highly suspect on how old the OS on their review unit is. It's obviously NOT a final build as the multi-media aspects of the OS are not working. This screams a beta testing unit to find and kill bugs to me and if You don't see people reviewing the public release candidate of Windows 7 so why is this fair? That's what previews are for.

I'm also extremely disappointed BGR decided to gloss over some of the features of WebOS that have everyone excited in the first place. Yes they talk about Synergy, but what about true and easy to manage (via the card metaphor) multi-tasking and intrusive notifications? These are big deals and hardly mentioned, if at all. You don't skip over major features in a review.

I'll give them their criticisms of the hardware's build quality, but I would have liked them to spend more then a day with the keyboard before calling it a failure. Hardware keyboards can sometimes take a little time to get used to.

As for the unit resetting itself on them, well again that's why you DO NOT review pre-release software. Until we hear about that happening to people on their brand new Pre's fresh out of a box from the SPRINT store it is not an issue.

Overall very disappointed in BGR and I can see why some of the bigger tech blogs such as Endgadget and Gizmodo have not reported on their preview/review yet.
Rousterfar
...
written by Rousterfar, May 29, 2009
Sorry about the typos in my post above. :)
waldoppper
...
written by waldoppper, May 29, 2009
Maybe it will turn some people away so I won't have as big of a problem getting mine Saturday morning..
Christopher Meinck
...
written by Christopher Meinck, May 29, 2009
Credit where credit is due. BGR was first. I suspect Engadget will be next, based on tweets about a mysterious upcoming review.
seraphemz
...
written by seraphemz, May 29, 2009
What do people consider the phonenews so called review??

Do you acknowledge that one Chris?

IMO... it was lame. Just wondering what you thought.
Agent K
...
written by Agent K, May 29, 2009
No word on multitasking, or speed of the device in loading apps?
0
...
written by PreRocks, May 29, 2009
Agent K, It does multi-task--better than the others in fact! Check out this recent comparison between the Pre, G1, and iPhone: http://tiny.cc/TechUbuiq

It is quite comprehensive!
Agent K
...
written by Agent K, May 29, 2009
I understand that it does multi-task, but no mention on how well or how speedy in the article. I don't want to multi-task if it cripples the device.
Christopher Meinck
...
written by Christopher Meinck, May 29, 2009
@seraphemz While some take issue with BGR's review, IMHO it's the only real review of the Pre. Photos, write-up. Could it have been more complete? Definitely, but it's certainly a review.
seraphemz
...
written by seraphemz, May 29, 2009
Cool thanks for the response.

PS.. Gemma Atkinson....gigggiitty giggitty. I never even heard of her before. Thanks for the pics.
Christopher Meinck
...
written by Christopher Meinck, May 29, 2009
@seraphemz She makes days working on the wallpaper gallery well worth it. ( ; Giggity!
0
...
written by Danny99000, May 29, 2009
It is absurd that you would find that lame "review" comprehensive. It was nothing of the sort and all you have to do is read the BGR comments to see that is far below his normal standards. It is an extended hands on at best and stupid to give BGR "credit" for such a poor job that was shoved out the door on a incomplete phone just so he could get the "credit" you are giving him.

@Agent K,

No word on anything of substance regarding the OS! He spent more words talking about app development on the phone compared to the 1st gen iPhone than the OS itself. Pathetic!
Christopher Meinck
...
written by Christopher Meinck, May 29, 2009
@ Danny99000 You're correct and I've made a revision.
hopper84
...
written by hopper84, May 29, 2009
the app store is disabled on the pre until it is launched which is why all the units out there now weren't able to review it. as well as mulitmedia. at least that's what I've been reading. all in all though, it's good to hear that the OS is solid and kinda sad that the keyboard is difficult to use. but i'll get used to it. it cant be any worse than the centro.
0
...
written by Dirk Belligerent, May 29, 2009
That "review" was nothing more than an extended hands-on preview. That they didn't bother to look into the multitasking, camera quality, GPS, and the PHONE CALL QUALITY - people do use these gizmos to talk to each other in a verbal manner, you know - is a sign that they're clueless as to what a proper review entails.

The review boils down to this: "Screen is beautiful, but not as good as the iPhone. It's really small and light and thus doesn't feel as quality as the iPhone. The keyboard doesn't suit us; the iPhone's virtual keyboard is better. Most of the multimedia doesn't work yet and we don't know if anyone will be able to match the iPhone's awesomeness."

Yeah, that's useful. See the tilt?

In the comments (around 100 in), they admitted, "It’s not our fault Palm/Sprint didn’t send us a final review unit. We managed to get our hands on one, and whatever it was, it was. This is the most recent available OS as far as we’re aware."

"[W]hatever it was, it was"?!?! WTF is that?!?!? That'd be like Roger Ebert reviewing the leaked Wolverine workprint and complaining about how poor the FX were. These guys are clowns. Save your clicks.
sonisoe
...
written by sonisoe, May 29, 2009
i didnt expect the qwerty to suit everyone, and the casing material to be as great as nokia's high-end devices or the iphone.. pretty obvious from the photo images we've seen so far.... but i still believe the webOS will work as well as it promised, and more importantly Palm can't afford for this device to be a flop....so i don't buy into the review, dont believe it's the final product...
dragonol2
...
written by dragonol2, May 30, 2009
I too call "shenanigans" on the "comprehensive-ness" of this review and at first when I read your summary I thought you (Chris) had put the word "comprehensive" in strike-thru font on purpose to show just how much it was NOT comprehensive. I agree that this is more of an extended preview and would think that they would be willing to offer more of a look at various qualities of the device if they actually had the opportunity to get with it hands on... oh well, we continue to wait...
Christopher Meinck
...
written by Christopher Meinck, May 30, 2009
Less than a week until release. One would think reviews will be available this week sometime.
dragonol2
...
written by dragonol2, May 31, 2009
Let's hope so... I'm really waiting for a review from CNET and PC World to check out what the "experts" think... I doubt it will really stop me from actually getting it though if the reviews are less than favorable...
momof3
...
written by momof3, June 03, 2009
Check out the article on PRICE from the New York Times. Nobody can argue that Palm winning on price.
http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/palms-pre-already-wins-the-wallet-wars/

Write comment

smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy